Skip to main content

GQP voter restrictions and the game behind the game

    Most people would tell you that the restrictive voter laws popping up all over the country are a direct response to Trump's pathetic whining about losing the 2020 Presidential Election he assumed was already rigged in his favor. And while that's true, there's also something more at play.


    When House Bill HR-1, the For the People Act, was introduced in early January of this year, two days before the Capital Insurrection, it threatened to put an end to partisan gerrymandering, thus forcing a party bereft of policy ideas, or for that matter, original thought, to do things they are no longer equipped to do. So, it's certainly no accident that the idea for Georgia's Election Integrity Act also came about in early January. And now the thinly-veiled backlash to HR-1 has spread from Georgia to Florida, and now to Texas.


    So, while hiding in Trump's shadow, the GQP is stacking the deck in their favor while doing everything possible to water down, impede, and ultimately attempt to block the passage of HR-1 and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. The latter would restore vital parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act gutted by the Supreme Court thanks to their decision in Shelby v. Holder in 2013.


      In the GQP's narrow, racist, misogynistic minds, if they can pass these restrictive voter laws at the state level, survive challenges in the federal judiciary crammed with unqualified, Trump-appointed judges, and block HR-1, they might be able to control everything, everywhere despite offering nothing to the American people beyond subservience to a twice impeached, retired amateur golfer.


      Even though reforming or doing away with the filibuster passes both HR-1 and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, there is the danger that GQPers will take advantage of its absence in the future to wreak absolute legislative havoc the first chance they get. Except, that's what they're doing right now. 


      For example, Texas State Representative Briscoe Cain's claim that he wasn't aware of the Jim Crow Era context of "voter purity" in the Texas Constitution is every bit as disingenuous as Colorado's Richard Holtorf's apparent shock that an African-American legislator might be offended by being referred to as "Buckwheat." Trotting out racist tropes and feigning ignorance gets you noticed in the GQP, and a lot of their members seem to have skin in the game. 


      So the choice is clear; the filibuster must go because there's no need to worry about the future if you allow the present to be destroyed right now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The miseducation of Texas, GQP style

     Texas House Bill 3979 is nothing more than an extension of Trumpism despite the naked emperor's hopefully permanent removal from both the White House and relevancy. State Rep. Steve Toth probably thinks he's made his GQP bones by introducing this bill when in actuality, he's making himself the face of ignorance, which in his world means "owning the libs" by any means necessary, win or lose.      Toth's bill seeks to ban the teaching of critical race theory, which, by the way, has not been proposed in Texas schools as pointed out by Rep. Jarvis Johnson, but it's a ban on critical thinking. Personally, I'm old enough to remember when critical thinking was looked upon as an essential element in the educational process. Yes, I'm sure I remember someone saying that.      H owever, this merry band of deluded historical revisionists will tell you the bill is about "teaching racial harmony by the telling the truth that we are all equal, both in ...

GQP Legislator operating in the Tennessee State Legislature on Three-Fifths of a Mind

Reader's Note:  Members of the Republican Party or Grand Old Party will henceforth be referred to as the GQP (Grand QAnon Party).         On Wednesday, when one of the GQP state legislative morons from my home state of Tennessee, Justin Lafferty, suggested the Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787 was an initial step toward ending slavery in the U.S., naturally, it set off a firestorm of public opinion.         However, three questions immediately popped into my mind:         1. Is this guy a blatant racist? (Probably. Who else would attempt that leap of logic?)         2. Was he taught this in school? (Possibly. Not every school follows a state-mandated curriculum, and just like we have bad judges, cops and lawyers; we have bad teachers as well)          3. Was he hoping to gain some white supremacist street cred in the process? (Definitely. In the GQP, being...